\n
Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n
Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal<\/em><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/h5>\n
<\/h5>\nClick to see Thesis<\/span><\/a><\/h5>\n<\/div>\n\nClick to see 4th Year work<\/span><\/a><\/h5>\n![\"IMG_9842_1_remaned2\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/IMG_9842_1_remaned2.jpg\")
<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nApproaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations<\/strong><\/h6>\nThe 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.\u201d<\/h6>\nWhat is considered \u2018heritage\u2019, as well as the value of heritage itself is constantly evolving, however the \u201ccultural significance\u201d of these \u201cmodest works\u201d in official documentation can be simultaneously indefinite and outdated. What validates something significant enough to preserve, for how long and how much of it?<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-5_1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-5_2-2.jpg\")
<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-8_1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-8_2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-10_1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-10_2.jpg\")
<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-10_3.jpg\")
<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-12.jpg\")
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-13_zoom2.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n![\"Heritage](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Heritage-Taxonomy-booklet-15.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-20-21.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-30.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-33.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-34-48.jpg\")
<\/div>\n![\"160528_Portfolio_2](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/160528_Portfolio_2-44.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n![\"Angie_axo\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Angie_axo.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n![\"Angie_manual\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Angie_manual1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n![\"Angie_vieuxport\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Angie_vieuxport1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"East](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/East-Elevation.jpg\")
![\"North](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/North-Elevation.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"South](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/South-Elevation.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"West](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/West-Elevation.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"Panorama1\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Panorama1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
![\"IMG_9882_1\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/IMG_9882_1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n![\"IMG_9849_1\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/IMG_9849_1.jpg\")
<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0![\"IMG_9992_1](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/IMG_9992_1-2.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"IMG_9842_1\"](\"https:\/\/unit-21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/IMG_9842_1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
\nClick to see 4th Year work<\/span><\/a><\/h5>\n
Click to see 4th Year work<\/span><\/a><\/h5>\n<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nApproaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations<\/strong><\/h6>\nThe 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.\u201d<\/h6>\nWhat is considered \u2018heritage\u2019, as well as the value of heritage itself is constantly evolving, however the \u201ccultural significance\u201d of these \u201cmodest works\u201d in official documentation can be simultaneously indefinite and outdated. What validates something significant enough to preserve, for how long and how much of it?<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nApproaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations<\/strong><\/h6>\nThe 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.\u201d<\/h6>\nWhat is considered \u2018heritage\u2019, as well as the value of heritage itself is constantly evolving, however the \u201ccultural significance\u201d of these \u201cmodest works\u201d in official documentation can be simultaneously indefinite and outdated. What validates something significant enough to preserve, for how long and how much of it?<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.\u201d<\/h6>\nWhat is considered \u2018heritage\u2019, as well as the value of heritage itself is constantly evolving, however the \u201ccultural significance\u201d of these \u201cmodest works\u201d in official documentation can be simultaneously indefinite and outdated. What validates something significant enough to preserve, for how long and how much of it?<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/h6>\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAerial photo 1926 vs. aerial photo 1944, with buildings of preservation highlighted.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n\n“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
“The building that moved”-the oldest surviving building in Marseille, the H\u00f4tel de Cabre, was repositioned in 1953 to align with the new plan.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\nConflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
Conflicting notions of historical significance:<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n\u00a01953 Construction of the Centre Bourse<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n15th Century King Ren\u00e9 d’ Anjou Pavilion<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/h6>\n\u00a0L’ Atelier Nadar collapse<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nArchitectural conservation principles, fundamentally based on changing \u2018cultural values\u2019, are translated and integrated into written urban planning policy, translated once more into physical built form; yet language itself is subject to cultural re-interpretation and manipulation by agents with particular agendas. This project explores the quirks and possibilities of applying such fixed regulations to built heritage at varying scales, celebrating subjective, yet valid, re-interpretation of the rules in the name of conservation. The accompanying thesis considers how the wording of heritage-led planning policies and changing understandings of certain conservation key terms influences urban form in historic city centres, where opposition between contemporary development and historic conservation is most apparently felt.<\/h6>\n<\/h6>\n
<\/p>\n
Click to zoom \u00a0-><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Click to see booklet \u00a0->Heritage Taxonomy<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n\nMarseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\n
Marseille, said to be \u201cthe only antique capital that doesn\u2019t crush us with the monuments of its past\u201d, has in its history been systematically demolished, re-planned and rebuilt. The destruction of the oldest part of the city, the Vieux Port quarter, during World War II was followed by a period of reconstruction which contained its own level of historic erasure. Now on a UNESCO Tentative List for its \u201ccultural heritage of outstanding universal value\u201d, the area consists mainly of 1950s and 1960s housing, with the exception of a handful of protected buildings from the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, including H\u00f4tel de Cabre – moved and rotated during the reconstruction to accommodate the widening of a main road.<\/h6>\nThe project draws from the existing Code du Patrimoine, observations of unofficial architectural preservation in Marseille and other\u00a0methods of commemoration to create a Code for\u00a0Marseille, modifying buildings along Marseille\u2019s\u00a0iconic Vieux Port to design a tourist information\u00a0centre and boutique hotel accommodation (while\u00a0maintaining their \u2018cultural significance\u2019). Principles\u00a0are translated into algorithmic modelling tools,\u00a0creating a rules-based design system to represent\u00a0the non-negotiable and, at times, non-sensical\u00a0application of certain policies in the name of\u00a0conservation.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\nClick to zoom-><\/h6>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Click to zoom-><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Click to zoom -><\/h6>\n<\/a><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/div>\nUN IMMEUBLE MEUBLE \/ A MOVABLE IMMOVABLE\u00a0| Marseille, France\u00a0| Unit 21 | 2016 Awarded Distinction for Design & Distinction for Thesis Awarded\u00a0The Bartlett School of Architecture Medal Click to see Thesis Click to see 4th Year work Approaches to conservation:\u00a0Mutable values, fixed regulations The 1964 Venice Charter extended\u00a0the previous notion of the \u201chistorical monument\u201d to include \u201cnot only great works of art but also to more modest works of the<\/p>\n<\/a> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"